(deletion nomination) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Deletion == |
== Deletion == |
||
I believe we should delete this category. It is not useful because more than half the cast are outlaws and it doesn't distinguish between the "good outlaws" and the "bad" ones. {{User:Blue Rook/Sig}} 08:47, October 11, 2010 (UTC) |
I believe we should delete this category. It is not useful because more than half the cast are outlaws and it doesn't distinguish between the "good outlaws" and the "bad" ones. {{User:Blue Rook/Sig}} 08:47, October 11, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | I personally think that [[:Category:Outlaws]] can be improved it just needs content to be added as there are plenty of outlaw charecters. |
||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Beamonde|Beamonde]] <sup>([[User talk:Beamonde|talk]])</sup> 16:37, October 11, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | but before i do anything what do you guys think |
||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Beamonde|Beamonde]] <sup>([[User talk:Beamonde|talk]])</sup> 16:41, October 11, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:53, 11 October 2010
Deletion
I believe we should delete this category. It is not useful because more than half the cast are outlaws and it doesn't distinguish between the "good outlaws" and the "bad" ones. Blue Rook talk contribs 08:47, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
I personally think that Category:Outlaws can be improved it just needs content to be added as there are plenty of outlaw charecters.
Beamonde (talk) 16:37, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
but before i do anything what do you guys think